Saturday, March 31, 2007

Great Blue Herons

Busy tonight, so here are a few photos from Steveston. A couple of great blue herons.

Fishing by the old pilings. Nice breast feathers. I hadn't seen that pattern before.

great blue heron
Browns and greens, and a silvery heron.

blue heron
This one is not cooperating. You can barely see the first one over behind the bank.

great blue heron
Going in for supplies? (Good pose, but you might have to look closely. Click on the photo.)

heron

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Googling "Slime Mold"

I'm still hoping for a closer identification of the birdhouse slime mold from the other day. Googling "Slime Mold", I came up with 475,000 entries. That's a lot of sites!

Add to that the Technorati search; another 700. And 1850 Google images.

But I am nothing if not persistent. (Or an experienced procrastinator; after all, I am supposed to be paying bills, not looking at pretty pictures.) And I have found some beautiful sites and photos. Here are a selection of (some of) the best.

Photos: a 55-photo Flickr set, by Myrioama. I especially liked this one.
Stephen Sharnoff. Just a few, but beautiful.
An amazing pink jelly.
Mycoweb. Go back to the main page for more Slime photos.

Blog posts: Lynne discovers orange jelly slime for the first time.
And the other end of the spectrum: The Beauty of Slime from Science Musings. Chet writes, "...with Whitmanesque gush, I sing their praises." Well-written and a good over-all description of their life-cycle.

An article by Hugh Griffith from E-Flora BC: Electronic Atlas of the Plants of British Columbia, about "intelligent slime" ("More amazing, if chopped into pieces that are then returned to a previous maze, the plasmodial bits will reassemble and start to move, avoiding dead ends and heading directly back to the food again.") and its weather prognostication talents.
And more intelligent slime: a slime mold drives a robot. From New Scientist.

And, of course, Wikipedia. Basic info, photos, and this drawing from Ernst Haeckel.

slime moldsAnd now, I really must go and pay those bills.

A Walk down New West Quay

Just the photos.

Sparrows and pigeon.
pigeon and sparrows

Budding branches against a cement pier.
buds

A mallard, also out for a stroll.
female mallard

Promises.
daffodils

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

I am far too easily distracted...

... or, the birds will just have to wait a bit.

Three sunny days in a row! Time to start organizing the garden and patio. I had the afternoon free, so I got to it. Washed windows, wiped down patio table and chairs, scrubbed out the bird bath, admired my sprouting perennials. And took down the bird house that had been turned topsy-turvy when it snowed those 18 inches in one day. I brought it in to be repaired and re-hung.

That was as far as I got. On the edge of the birdhouse roof, I noticed a sprinking of tiny black dots raised above the surface on millimetre-tall stalks. Slime mold!

Out came the camera and magnifying glass. And here they are:
Click on this one to see them close-up. Aren't they beautiful?

These are cellular slimes, but I couldn't identify them confidently. They look more or less like Comatricha to me; what species, I can't tell. Or alternately, they could be Japanese lantern slime, Dictydium.

Slimes are among the strangest creatures I have seen. Neither animal nor vegetable; one moment acting like independent amoebae, then the next organizing themselves into one organism and growing like a mushroom. In recent years, scientists have moved them into a separate kingdom, Protista, which they share with other tiny nucleated organisms like amoeba and algae.

They start off life from a spore, and grow as separate amoeba-like animals, eating bacteria, etc. At some time, they start to clump, then "migrate" as a single organism to an appropriate location, where they grow like a plant, some becoming stem cells, other spore cases (sporangia) or spores. One type, at a certain stage, loses its individual cell walls and becomes a mass of flowing naked protoplasm, hence "slime".

Others become masses of jelly; I have come across blobs of transparent "orange marmalade" in the dry bush near Chase, in the BC interior. Around here, I find bright yellow blobs, somewhat smaller. Or what looks like brilliant orange, red or yellow insect egs stuck to rotting sticks under the evergreens, or masses of scrambled eggs. Once, in a hollow stump, we found a white mass about the size and consistency of boiled cauliflower. In the process of migrating, some look like a tangle of threads, or pretzels. You name it; slime mold will imitate it.

And then there's the "dog vomit" slime. Yes, that is its name. And you can guess what it looks like. That one, I haven't seen yet. Just as well.

Here are a few links with fascinating photographs: Photo Gallery of Mycometes, Fungal Biology, George Barron (U. of Guelph), Hidden Forest, and a blog entry from Sitka Nature.

The bird house? I eventually got back to it, and replaced its floor. But I'll have to hang it up tomorrow. If it's not raining again.

I liked this photo; the silhouettes of slime fruiting bodies in a misty, moody atmosphere.

Monday, March 26, 2007

First Annual Blogger Bioblitz

Just passing the word along: Jeremy Bruno, at the Voltage Gate, issued an invitation to join the First Annual Blogger Bioblitz.

He writes;
"In honor of National Wildlife Week, April 21 - 29, I am inviting bloggers from all walks to participate in the First Annual Blogger Bioblitz, where bloggers from across the country will choose a wild or not-so-wild area and find how many of each different species - plant, animal, fungi and anything in between - live in a certain area within a certain time.
Pick a neat little area that you are relatively familiar with and is small enough that you or the group can handle - a small thicket, a pond, a section of stream, or even your backyard - and bring along some taxonomic keys or an Audubon guide, or if you're lucky enough, an expert in local flora and fauna. Set a time limit. Try to identify the different species of organisms that you find as well as the number of each species that you find. Take pictures if you have a digital camera, compile your numbers, make observations, set up your post however you wish as long as you include your numbers in a digestible fashion (I'll have more details on that later) - then submit it to me and I'll include it on the list. We will also be tallying total numbers of each species found, and then a grand total."
I joined up, since he opens it to individuals with a backyard. Now, I just hope it doesn't pour rain all that week.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

More at Burning Silo.

Wood Ducks and Spring Blooms

A couple of weeks ago, exploring, we discovered a tiny park behind an new (horrendous, pretentious and astoundingly ugly, so bad we've been staying out of that area) housing development just a few minutes away from home. At the time, it was cold and we were tired, but there was a pond and a trail, a flock of American wigeons and the inevitable mallards sleeping on the grass. Next sunny day, we promised ourselves.

And yesterday it stopped raining (finally!), so off we went. We walked all the way around the pond, leaving the far end of the creek for another day.
The park takes advantage of a widening in Cougar Creek, at the upper end of Cougar Canyon, which is a quite deep gorge with a creek and a trail of sorts at the bottom; here, it is tamed, fenced and bridged. There are signs up announcing a "Releafing Project" and salmon enhancement. Good stuff.
And the ducks were there, floating idly in the center. Mallards, buffleheads, wigeons, mostly. But at the far end, while Laurie was in the bushes photographing fungus on a decaying log, I saw, on the opposite shore, a pair of wood ducks.

Now, these guys are shy. I have only seen them close enough to identify once before, at Reifel Island Bird Sanctuary, and even then, it was just a glimpse between the branches. And here they were, in plain sight! Trouble was, they were swimming fast; by the time I'd got the camera ready, they were out of range. I got one small, very fuzzy photo of the male. Laurie came along just as they disappeared, so he didn't get a photo either.
Never mind; now I know they're there. And we'll be back.

As for the "releafing"; the plants are co-operating.

A wild rose, just getting started.
Sticky leaf buds.
Salmonberry leaves.
And a bud.
Osoberry, or Indian plum. Good bird food later this summer.
And flowering currant. I love these plants; I had one in a previous home. They are not especially edible, but they make such a cheerful showing in the spring undergrowth!

I know it's late, but...

... Good Planets is up at Burning Silo. Theme: A Memory. Great photos, wonderful memories. Go see.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Nebalia (Muddy Buddies, Part III)

This is Part II of a three-part series, reproduced from my old blog. (Here) Part I, Part II. (On this blog)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Continued from Muddy Buddies, Part I and Part II , in which I told of the finding of this tiny crustacean.

To go on with the nature of the beast:-

This particular nebalia (pugettensis) has no fixed English name. Some call it a "sea flea", although what it has in common with fleas, I fail to see. Some Canadian sources call it the Mud Flat Hooded Shrimp, and this at least points us in the general direction. But it is not a shrimp, nor exclusive to mud flats, nor is that "rostrum" a hood; it's more like a rhino's horn.

One thing, though; nebalia loves mud. It lives around the world in muddy bottoms, from tidal flats to "abyssal" depths, "abyssal" referring to 2000 to 5000 metres underwater. The pressure down there, at the 5000 metre level, is 500 atmospheres, or 750 lbs per square inch. Amazing versatility!

We found them in Boundary Bay, because the sand is half mud; the other end of the beach is all sticky, impassible, stinking mud, and just across the water is Mud Bay. I've half a mind to go over there and dig for live nebalia. Nebalia loves mud, shallow or deep.

Eugene Kozloff , in Seashore Life, says, "The situations where it is plentiful generally show signs of being quite foul when they are stirred up." (p.241) That would describe the area perfectly.

And down there in the muck, they stir up the water, streaming it through the carapace, filtering out edible bits of organic matter, plant or animal. They are scavengers, too; they have been caught in traps baited with dead crabs, several days old. Part of the clean-up crew, all those billions of tiny unsung heroes filtering our water, carting away our leavings.

And yet, they are so beautiful! So clean looking; that glistening, glassy carapace, that polished horn. So delicate; the flowing, feathery tail. And those ruby-red eyes!

What are they seeing, down there, deep, deep down in the mud and slime, with those brilliant eyes of theirs?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So: thanks to Bev, again, for her lessons in photography. Which I can benefit from, even though my camera is the beginners' model. Maybe some day ...

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Nebalia (Muddy Buddies, Part II)

This is Part II of a three-part series, reproduced from my old blog. (Here) Part I, Part III.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Continued from Muddy Buddies, Part I , in which I recounted the discovery of some unknown (to me) sea creatures.

At home, I dug out my supplies: water to wash the sand off my finds, a good magnifying glass, my hand microscope (up to a power of 40x), a small paintbrush for manipulating delicate tentacled objects, a bright lamp. And a stack of books.

First; a birds-eye view. Length; about 1/4 inch, counting the tail structure. Two very prominent red eyes; the most arresting feature. Colour: once cleaned, almost transparent, with a creamy tinge and darker central section. Legs to the sides, two hooked tentacles, grippers or something in front. And a prominent tail, about half the length of the entire creature, curving downwards.

With the magnifying lens, the tail seemed to be segmented, and the front had some sort of a pointy beak; there was a similar pointy structure at the end of what looked like a shell, above the tail. A shell means a crustacean. I turned to my books.

The creature as I saw it and drew it, having no camera.
nebalia drawing
In Seashore Life of Puget Sound, (etc.) , I found it. Page 241, three whole paragraphs and a photo. My beastie now has a name; Nebalia pugettensis, belonging to an order called the Leptostraca. (Lepto=thin, straca=shell.) No English name. The shell is called a carapace, like the shell of a turtle. That little beak thingy is called a rostrum. (Hey, I thought that was a stand for the speaker at a convention! The dictionary tells me it can also be an elongated beak. Well, ok, if you say so.)

A photo from the web, but a different species, nebalia bipes.
A website mentioned feathery feet. Time to open up the microscope. The nice thing about the hand microscope is that I can look at things in situ. I'm glad I did, this time. On the piece of paper towel where my nebalia were drying, I could see, at full power (40x) long, ostrich-feather plumes at the end of the tail, almost transparent. But so delicate! When I moved the nebalia to a better viewing base (a white plastic lid), using the tip of the paintbrush at the thick of the thorax as a lift, and looked again, the delicate fronds were broken off, leaving ragged stumps.

Now I could see that the carapace and rostrum, and a long point over the tail, are transparent. The colour comes from the pale legs and thorax underneath. 4 legs on either side, with another thing that could be a leg or an antenna; my samples were dead and curled up, making it hard to distinguish them. Two more pointy things at the front. The tail was definitely segmented, looking like a telescoping leg of a camera stand. Two little vanes at the end of the tail, and the sad remains of feathers.

And the eyes! Big, round, and deep, deep red. And segmented, beautifully regular honeycombed sections, each one an individual eye, no doubt . Enlarged and somehow hardened, they would make nice jewels for a ring or necklace.

Next: what were these guys doing on that beach? I'll leave that for the next post.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Next post: Muddy Buddies, Part III

Friday, March 23, 2007

Experimenting with lenses, and nebalia

Yesterday, reading Bev's blog entry on camera techniques (loved that spider portrait how-to!), I remembered a trick I had read about while I was still wishing for a digital. Something that just might possibly work with my economy model, with its 7-in limit on close-ups.

I dropped everything and dug out my fixings...

I have a good lens that I bought at Value Village for a buck. It seems that it is a part of a (missing) older slide projector. Solid, unscratched, and well-ground. I placed it in front of the lens on my camera (set for close-ups) and took a few trial shots. It seemed to work. So I dug out my four dried nebalia pugettensis from last June, and photographed them. Uploaded the photos to the computer, and looked at them. WoW! Better than I had ever hoped!

Here are the 4:
nebalia pugettensis

And here's one on his own:
nebalia
OK: time to back-track to the story. I discovered these on the beach ...

No, not that way; I'll just post the three parts of the story as I wrote it on my old blog.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Part I: "Muddy Buddies"

"This world is so full of a number of things, I'm sure we should all be as happy as kings."

Robert Louis Stevenson wrote that, long ago. In my books, he has a point. But I doubt that he was referring to nebalia, which made me happy this weekend.

It was a bright, sunny day, and we were in Boundary Bay Park . So was half the population of Surrey, with their kites and kids, umbrellas and sunscreen. The tide was out; it looked like we could almost walk to Mud Bay, just beyond. And 'way out at the edge of the water there was a white line that, on examining it through the binoculars, looked like a seagull convention. We decided to walk out.

Mount Baker was ahead, seemingly floating on a haze of grey cloud; MN (Laurie) had to keep stopping to take photos. I was watching where I stepped. The sand was covered completely, carpeted so that it looked almost black, with small needle snails*. Looking closely, I could distinguish 4 different types; 3 smaller ones, up to about 1/2 inch long, one dark brown and two with spiralling bands of white and brown. And a larger snail, paler brown and over an inch long. I wished I could float, like Mount Baker, over the sand; I could hear the shells crunching under my sandals. Couldn't be helped.

It was a long walk. I picked up a crab shell or two, and discarded them when I found them broken. Other than that, there were just the snails for a while, then empty sand with an occasional open clam shell, seagull dinner. We reached the water's edge just in time for the seagulls to rise with a great clamour and move back, behind us. They knew something we didn't.

We turned back. I confess it was a bit of a letdown; there was nothing more to see at water's edge than there had been half-way back down the beach. MN found a seagull to photograph. I waited, walking slowly, looking at the sand.

Then I saw them. First, it was the dead crabs. Small crabs. Smaller than any I had seen, almost paper-thin and transparent. I bent and picked one up on a fingertip. And saw another, and another.

How do you collect delicate shells when you forgot to bring a container? MN was back from his photoshoot; he found me a medium-sized clamshell half full of sand. Perfect! I stored the crabs safely, went to look for another. And found something I had never seen before: a half-dozen or so of tiny golden animacules, half the size of the crabs, with a little tail the length of the body. Four of them went into the clamshell before we realized why the seagulls had left.

The tide was coming in. And the beach is so flat, it ran like a river. So did we.

Next: What are these beasties?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*The snails were probably some variety of bittium.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Part II in next post.

Blueberry muffin and Garlic

Playing with my new camera again.

Garlic, responding to our BC spring humidity.

And a muffin at Tim Hortons. Blueberry. Laurie's favourite.


I'm really supposed to be either working or sleeping, so as to get to work early tomorrow. Deadlines, again.

So I guess that's it for tonight.

Tomorrow: nebalia pugettensis, and an experiment with lenses.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

So Sad! And a warning: keep a lookout for this.

I'm passing on a message from Bill of the Birds about another of those horrible "unintended consequences".

"... hole-punched sign posts could be inadvertently deadly to perching raptors.

... the owl was suspended by a single talon that had apparently gotten caught in the top hole of the post. Clearly the bird flew in and perched on top of the post. Then, when it tried to leave, found itself caught by a talon through the hole. It had struggled to free itself, and likely starved to death.

... And they asked us at BWD to help spread the word about the unintentional danger these sign posts may pose to any raptor with talons that perches on top. This style of sign post or fence post is commonly used, so how can the danger be reduced?"

Read the rest here.

The Martians are Here!!!

And we got a clear photo of the invasion!!!

We were just lucky Laurie didn't get zapped by any of those death rays!!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well, not exactly. Laurie didn't actually see the invading army; he had his back turned and was taking a photo of the reflections in a store window. So there may be some other explanation for those flying saucers. Just possibly.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Invading the privacy of eagles

It's rare that the eagles we see ever take notice of us. And why would they? We're beneath them (literally), earth-crawlers, slow-pokes, bound to our little trails and roadways.

So this trio surprised us.

In our program of gradually moving north on the Boundary Bay - Mud Bay dike trail, we had driven as far as we could go on Tsawwassen streets and parked at Beach Grove Park, with the intent of taking one of the many little alley-ways to the beach. (See map.) Instead, we crossed the park and followed a narrow trail into the trees, hoping to hit the shore in that direction.

In this area, most of the trees are cottonwoods, and many of the largest had been sawed off, leaving tall snags. (They tend to fall over easily when they get too big, so cutting them is wise in populated areas.) A sign explained that the dead stumps had been left for food, perches and nesting for the local birds. Near the top of one of the tallest, I saw a large eagle's nest. No eagles, though.

Our trail petered out at a bit of a creek, too deep for our shoes. We back-tracked and found a way around the wood, at the edge of the farmland. A few birds called in the bush, but otherwise we were alone. Ahead of us, we saw the dike across a plowed field; it was fenced, so we had to turn south again, back towards the street.

We had worked our way about half-way down the sea-ward side of the wood, when we heard a loud, indignant-sounding "Squawk!" I looked up, and there was a young eagle directly overhead. On more distant branches two mature eagles sat silently, ignoring us, as they do.

Of course, we both started madly snapping photos, walking slowly towards the base of the trees. When we got too close, all three rose into the air and flew away. A couple more clicks of the shutter, and they were out of range.

Here are the closest two, one adult, one "kid":

Laurie got an excellent shot of the young one, flying directly overhead. If you look closely, you can see how he was turning his head to look down at these rude intruders. Click on the photo; enlarged, you can even see the pupil of his eye.

We walked on, and the eagles returned to the roosts where we had first seen them. But when we got back to the road (through a narrow gap in the fence), I looked back again. Not a sign of them, nor of the big nest. They had chosen their spots carefully, where they could not be seen from anywhere along the street. No wonder the young one was perturbed when we "snuck around" from the fields.

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Hiding in Plain Sight, continued

Continued from yesterday: a walk along Boundary Bay.

I am still learning the ropes with this digital camera. So my focus on this walk along the shore was on seeing what it would do outside, in bright sunlight. I snapped wildly as we went along, at anything and everything, from scenery to the little puddles left by the tide. Even this, which I think is a roller from an ancient wringer washer.

The beach was almost deserted, the tide well out. Not a seagull in sight. And this area was mostly bare of eelgrass. Nothing to see, really, but sand and sky. I turned over a stone with my toe, and tiny crabs scuttled away from the sudden light, buried themselves in the sand again. I investigated a few more puddles and saw movements, something tiny and pale, visible for only a moment. Bending down low, I could see pinkish shrimp-like creatures, almost transparent. I took photos, without much hope of getting anything through the reflecting surface of the water.

Farther on, I found a light-coloured snail and practiced on it.

At home, I blew up my photos and looked them over. I got the shrimp! Yay!

Pale and blurry they may be, but still; I can see their little eyes and the curve of the body. Encouraging.


And that snail? He had company. There is a crab beside him that I hadn't even noticed, looking straight at it on the beach, possibly because he's wearing camouflage colours. And barnacles, and limpets in several colours, another snail. Going back to the "shrimp" photo, I realized I was also seeing something that looks like a white tube with tentacles on the end; some kind of a worm. And something starfish-purple.

Click on the photos to see them full size. For comparison, the snail is about a centimetre ( almost half an inch) long, the "shrimp" about half that.

I brought home a handful of dead eel-grass from the high-tide line, and a bit of plain sand. Looking at it through my hand microscope (40x), I discovered that it was full of worms, some large enough to see segments, the intestines and a whip-like tail, some so small that they seemed barely more than a lively thread.

Nothing to see but sand? I will never say that again.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Checking the blogs yesterday, I ran across a photo posted by GrrlScientist, submitted by an underwater photo site, of a Leafy Sea Dragon. Absolutely stunning! And what an example of camouflage! (Copyrighted: you'll have to click on the link to see it.)

Jeff writes,
"Sea Dragons are arguably the most spectacular and mysterious of all ocean fish. Though close relatives of sea horses, sea dragons have larger bodies and leaf-like appendages which enable them to hide among floating seaweed or kelp beds. ...

...Leafy Sea Dragons are very interesting to watch-- the leafy appendages are not used for movement. The body of a sea dragon scarcely appears to move at all. Steering and turning is through movement of tiny, translucent fins along the sides of the head (pectoral fins, visible above) and propulsion derives from the dorsal fins (along the spine). Their movement is as though an invisible hand were helping, causing them to glide and tumble in peculiar but graceful patterns in slow-motion. This movement appears to mimic the swaying movements of the seaweed and kelp. Only close observation reveals movement of an eye or tiny fins."
He has many more photos; beautiful, all of them. Go over and browse.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Next: eagles, same day.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Hiding in plain sight on the beach

A couple of days ago we returned to Boundary Bay beach, where we walk (and I poke at the sand/mud/stones under our feet) fairly often.

This is one side of a shallow bay, blending gradually into Mud Bay on the opposite shore. (See satelite photo. Google, edited.) There is a walk along the dike most of the way around. On repeated visits, we are gradually working our way north from Boundary Bay.
The beach at Boundary Bay Park, at the south end, is mostly sandy, with muddy patches. It is a favourite place for picnics, wading, and occasional swimming. (It is a long, long way out to deeper water.) As we walk north, we run into muddy patches and lots of eelgrass. At the Mud Bay end, it is all -- you guessed it! -- mud.

On our first visit, I was astounded at the quantities of snails on the beach; millions upon millions of them. (I wrote about these on my former blog.) The sand, where it was clear of snails, was covered with the castings of lugworms.
That first day, I also discovered a Nebalia pugettensis, the first I had ever seen. On future visits, we found sand dollars and jellyfish umpteen crabs, and tiny clamshells.

I have taken to collecting samples of mud and kelp to bring home and examine with my hand microscope. Each time I discover new wonders.

So far, I have seen:
  • 4 kinds of snails
  • nebalia
  • sand dollars
  • crabs, several varieties
  • lugworm castings (one of these days, I'll dig one up.)
  • clamshells and spouts of larger clams (geoducks?)
  • tiny shrimp-like swimmers
  • minnows
  • beach hoppers
  • hermit crabs
  • limpets
  • miniscule worms
  • jellyfish
  • and of course, barnacles
And plants:
  • pickleweed
  • eelgrass
  • red algae
  • bladder kelp
  • sea lettuce
  • assorted slimes
Birds, many, but few species:
  • seagulls
  • eagles
  • crows
  • sandpipers
What did we see this time? Next post.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

I always wished I had something like this!

Eyes on a stalk; now, that would be so useful! Even better than eyes in the back of my head. (Which I have; just ask my kids.)

See Pharyngula, the "lovely stalk-eyed fly".

Pareidolia at the "Skeptic's Circle, # 56"

One of my favourite carnivals is the Skeptic's Circle. This time, they've included my posts on pareidolia. A little something to nibble at between the heavy-duty courses; Orac on alternative medicine and Tara Smith at Aetiology. Plus a nice line-up of bloggers I don't know, yet.

Head on over and see!

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

It's a mystery to me ...

... how this stays afloat.

Discovered at the Steveston Docks, still lined up with the working boats. If I were on it, I'd be afraid to cast off.

But the owners do keep their venetian blinds dusted and the windows clean. I'll say that for them.

Monday, March 12, 2007

... and on to Steveston

Before we left the Buddhist temple (see previous post), we walked around the parking lot to a road leading to tall trees, gleaming in the sunlight. At an open gate, a sign read, "No entry to gardens," but we rationalized that this was for cars trying to drive through to find an exit, and walked on. A couple of workers saw us and smiled, so it must have been ok.

The trees were covered in large pussy-willows; Laurie got out the camera again.


Afterwards, we got back on the road and drove down to the old fishing village of Steveston. We ate lunch in a sandwich place, then meandered through gift shops on our way down to the pier.

The boardwalks were deserted; it's early in the season, and the crowds mostly show up on weekends, even in summer. A pair of Greater Scaups* in their best breeding finery were fishing in the quiet water.


It's not often we get to see these; their habitat is tundra and boreal forests, but sometimes they winter this far south. And they are divers, eating clams and crabs and the like, so are less interested in humans than the hand-out loving mallards. It was a real treat to see them paddling back and forth in the sunlight or diving for crabs, which are plentiful in Steveston. The female came up once with something that glinted like a fish, but could have been vegetation.

* I identify them as Greater Scaup, because the head of the male had the green sheen. The Lesser is almost identical, but his head shines purple.

A young seagull, tipping his head to see what Laurie was up to. Notice the barring on the underside of his tail. I hadn't been in a position to see that before.


Reflections on the water along the docks.


And flotsam. Frayed rope, bits of wood, you-name-it. It made an interesting pattern, I thought.

The sun was setting; we headed home for supper, tired, but exhiliarated.

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Visit to the local Buddhist Temple

For some time now, I have been telling Laurie I wanted to show him a beautiful jade sculpture of the Guan-Yin (Kwan Yin) Bodhisattva, housed in the Buddhist Temple in Richmond (about 20 minutes drive for us). Last week, on a sunny spring-like day, he said, "Well, let's go."

So we did.

And I have a stack of photos to share.

A little bit about the temple, first: their website tells us ,

"To date, the Temple is the most exquisite example of traditional Chinese architecture in Canada. In many ways, it is like a piece of art straight out of the Chinese past, as it resembles any authentic temple that can be found along the banks of the Yangtze River in China, where one of the world's oldest civilizations originated.

The main focus of the exterior of the Temple is its palatial roof, which is similar in structure to that of any royal edifice within the Forbidden City of Beijing, China. The roof is covered entirely with red-orange porcelain tiles imported from China. As strikingly intriguing as the facade of the Temple is its artistic interior, which houses artifacts with superlative Chinese workmanship in sculpture, painting, carpentry and embroidery. Traditional Chinese art and culture are evident in the majestic Buddha/Bodhisattva statues, exquisite shrines, enormous silk paintings of the sixteen Arahats, and the spectacular ceramic murals."

They're not exaggerating. It was impressive the first time I saw it, some 20 years ago, and they have been constantly adding to it since then. And they haven't even mentioned the landscaping. Think Zen, think centuries of wind and water, think colour.

The jade Guan-Yin arrived sometime, if I remember correctly, in the 1980s. It was carved from a 2-ton piece of BC jade, mined in northern BC, shipped to China for the sculpting, and shipped back to the temple, where for a time it stood in a large crate outside the main hall. Then it was moved to a cubby-hole off the dining room for some time. The last time I had seen it, it was in a display stand outside the main entrance. Of all the treasures on display, this was the one I loved.

'nuff: on to some of our photos.

First, along the sides of the parking lot, on a carefully-manicured slope of lawn, we are greeted by rocks and sculptures.

A rock. I have been told the symbolism or meaning of some of the rocks here, so I am fairly confident that this one means something, too. I have no idea what.


In a small open shelter, the 16 disciples of the Buddha (arahats), each displaying his trademark characteristic. I've forgotten which 2 these are.

Another rock, just outside the shelter.

A few steps further down, protected by a slatted roof that will support flowering vines in the summer, a Guan-Yin, larger than life-sized. She often is portrayed carrying this upside-down vase, as a sign that she is sprinkling blessings on all beings.

A closer look at her.

Past the first gate now; this is one corner of the pool outside the main courtyard.

And the outside of the courtyard gate.

Inside the courtyard, Laurie took no photos. I probably would have tried, and been disappointed; there's no way anyone could do justice to the statues there. Even on their own webpage, they are diminished, shrunken.

Here's their photo of the "thousand-arm Guan-Yin". To get an idea of the size, the base is about chest-height to me, if I remember correctly. Camphor wood, covered with gold leaf. A thousand hands, so she can help all those who come to her, I have been told. And a thousand eyes, one in each palm. Many faces, looking in every direction; she sees, she knows. So they say, qualifying that with, "... if you believe."

Astounding, overwhelming, yes, but too garish for my tastes. On to look for the jade!

Inside the temple (several buildings, the final one of which had a sign: "Under construction: no entry.") no photo-taking is allowed. Upstairs, in a small shop, there were statuettes of different Buddha and guardian figures for sale, some of them new, some antique, many beautiful. We spent quite a bit of time and some money here.

And there I asked about the jade Guan-Yin. I had not seen her anywhere. "I'm sorry," I was told, "she is in the new Meditation Hall, and it is closed for construction." It will be open sometime in the spring. So we'll be coming back.

Here is a very bad, very small, photo of this statue, taken from the BT website, as she was before the latest move.
Powered By Blogger