I'm not very good at identifying mushrooms. I do try, but with only occasional success.
It's not that I'm new to this; I've been looking at mushrooms for decades. In the 1980s I was harvesting mushrooms for the table: pine mushrooms (Matsutake), which we sold, and ate the ones that got broken on the way down the mountainside; puffballs fried in butter, boletes (good in beefy stews if you can find ones not full of worms), shaggy manes (Coprinus comatus). I tried a local Russula; rubbery and tasteless, like chewing erasers in school. Or I can go back and back; Mom was a fan of Euell Gibbons, the wild-food enthusiast; puffballs were a favourite treat.
And some mushrooms are either so easily identified or so common in my neck of the woods, that I don't have to think twice. Red-belted polypores, the Rusty-gilled polypore, Turkey-tails, and the poisonous clan of the Amanitas. The Artist's Conk: when I was a child, many homes displayed one of these, with a scene painted on the underside. I have one that Laurie climbed a tree on Simon Fraser mountain to pick for me. I haven't painted it. Yet. There's the Cat's-tongue mushroom (aka Toothed Jelly Fungus: I love all these names!) and the tiny Birds' Nests, and the look-alike Witches' Butter and Orange Jelly. And the miniature Douglas-fir Collybia, which grows mostly from between the scales on Douglas-fir cones. And, I think, my favourite; the Lichen Agaric, both a mushroom and a lichen, looking like a delicate parasol.
But others? I look at them, take their photos, pay attention to their surroundings, and then pore through the guide books and websites, ending up saying, "Not this one. Nor this. Probably not that, either. Maybe, maybe ..."
But I find them all beautiful. And fascinating. So I keep trying.
I don't harvest them any more; our ecosystem is so fragile these days, what with the constant encroachment of human "civilization" and the changing climate, I leave them be, try not to damage them in any way.
On a friend's lawns a few blocks away, mushrooms sprout everywhere this time of year. Sometimes we find them entire and unblemished. But something, something, maybe a local bear, knocks many of them over, leaving shreds scattered about. A good opportunity to look at undersides and touch-test them, guilt-free.
White, straight, gills. And a smaller mushroom with gills visible through the traslucent cap. |
Questions I ask when I get the chance to examine a mushroom from beneath:
Two pieces, as found. The cap is slightly moist, not quite sticky, not slimy. |
Here, I get a look at the construction of the stalk. It is not hollow, but has a smoother inner section. I had read that the Russulas' stalks break cleanly, like chalk. I snapped this one. I'm not quite sure; the outer skin peels; the inner section snaps. I think it's probably a Russula.
Base of the stalk. |
Is the stalk straight? Does it have a ring around the base, or under the cap? Is it smooth? Is the base enlarged?
Not gills, but pores. |
On our common shelf mushrooms, polypores, the pores are pinpricks or smaller. Boletes, or at least all the boletes I have looked at, have slightly larger pores. This one has large, wide-open pores.
Another piece, of a similar mushsroom. |
This was all I found of this particular mushroom. It was that red colour, as shown. Probably the same species as the one above, just older.
Tan gilled mushroom. With fingertip for size. |
Here the gills have long blades, stalk to rim, and other half blades, between them, along the rim.
A small group. Notice how the gills are separate from the top of the stalk. |
And, as usual, I can't identify the species of these mushrooms. It doesn't matter, really. I'm not going to try to eat them. Leave that to the bears. And the slugs.
- Carne blanca, con laminillas derechitas. También hay un honguito donde se ven las laminillas atravez del sombrero. Las preguntas que me hago cuando puedo examinar las laminillas: ¿Son laminillas, o poros? ¿Las laminillas; están apretadas o separadas? ¿Van desde el tallo hasta el borde del sombrero o no? ¿Terminan al llegar al tallo, o siguen bajando una pequeña distancia? ¿Están fijas o separadas del tallo?
- Dos pedazos, como los encontré. La superficie del sombrero es un poco húmeda, apenas pegajosa, pero no resbalosa. El tallo, cortado, no tiene hueco en el centro. Había leido que el tallo de las especies de Russula se rompen de golpe, como por ejemplo se rompe una ramita bien seca. Rompí este. No estoy segura, pero parece ser Russula; la carne se rompió limpiamente; solo la corteza se separó en tiras.
- Base del tallo. ¿El tallo, es derecho? ¿Tiene la base hinchada? ¿Tiene un anillo alrededor de la base, o debajo del sombrero?
- A una poca distancia, encontré este hongo tumbado. No tiene laminillas, sino poros. Los políporos locales tienen poros tan pequeños como el punto de un alfiler. Los boletus, por lo menos los que he examinado también tienen poros; los que he visto antes son, a lo más, como la cabeza de esos alfileres. Este hongo tiene poros grandes, bien abiertos.
- Otro pedazo, probablemente de la misma especie. Estaba de este color rojo intenso; tal vez sea más viejo.
- Honguitos tirados, estos con laminillas de dos tamaños; unas que van desde el tallo hasta el borde del sombrero, otras que se apegan nada más al borde.
- Un grupo. Se ven como las laminillas están separadas del tallo.
Your post is a radiant example of brilliance! Insightful, well-articulated, and truly valuable. Thanks for sharing your perspective.
ReplyDelete