Showing posts with label 36 eggs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 36 eggs. Show all posts

Monday, March 03, 2008

Egg and duck and frog and ... dog


Update on 36 photos of an egg:

Hugh, at Rock, Paper, Lizard, has posted "somewhat fewer than 36"* on the Flickr group page. He had to stop at 10, because, he says, "the dog ate the egg."

Now, why does that sound familiar? Any schoolteachers out there? What do you think?

Anyhow, go see his photos, and the accompanying blog post.

Still to come in; some "doozies" from Jamon, and some from Auj.

Anyone else?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Update to the update: Hugh writes that more photos are coming in. And his latest is in, and it's a doozy. All excuses are accepted, as of now.
.

Saturday, March 01, 2008

Looking at an egg again

Last Monday, I posted a photographic challenge, borrowed from an article in WaveLength Magazine; take 36 Photos of an egg.

A few of my readers indicated that they planned to try. So far, one, at Cicero Sings, has posted her photos in the Flickr group I set up for the purpose. (I hope that there will be more, later.)

Robin's egg, collected after the chick had flown.

Well, I took my 36 photos, and more, and learned something in the process, enough, maybe for several blog posts.

First, though, Cicero's eggs:

We each looked at the assignment from our own perspective; however, a couple of shots are remarkably similar; both Cis* and I photographed the freckles of the egg shell with light behind it, both of us showed the eggs in the carton, both broke and cooked the eggs. There the similarities end.

Cis saw the eggs from a warm domestic perspective, cooking, garnishing and serving them. Her photo of a breakfast laid out on the placemat, eggs with a cinnamon roll, water in a glass, coffee, brought back happy memories of Cariboo kitchens, with the coffee fragrant and the conversation relaxed; thanks, Cis!

I am weird, though. And not domestic, at all. Frying an egg was the limit. (And besides, I got hot oil on my lens and had to clean it. Not good.)

I spent some time just looking at the egg. Paying attention. Asking myself questions. And then almost randomly, wandering around to see what seemed to have some association in my mind to the "eggness" of the egg.

One of those associated objects was a bowl of rocks.


An egg is fragile. One crack on the side of the frying pan, and it breaks wide open. A few pecks from the baby -- how tiny and weak he is! -- from inside, and the shell gives way. We crumble the shell in our hands to spread on the garden to discourage slugs, smush a half-dozen into a handful to throw in the trash.

But an egg is incredibly strong. Grab one just right, and you can squeeze with all your strength without breaking it. Cut two egg shells in half, and you can stack books on them, even sometimes stand on them without crumbling them. (Internet Encyclopedia of Science, para.4)

Therefore, rocks.

What makes an egg so sturdy without sacrificing its open-sesame policy for the chicks? The shape. The round sides transmit stress evenly along the walls; it is only when the egg is impacted from a cross-wise direction that it breaks easily. Therefore, we crack the egg against a bowl or the frying pan; the chick pecks at one spot, against the inward curve.

Googling for formulas (how strong is eggshell strong?), I found other fascinating facts:

Did you know (I didn't) that the reason sea-going birds can lay their eggs on narrow rock ledges, without a nice deep nest, is that their eggs have pointy ends?
Murres lay one egg on a bare nesting ledge. Their egg is very pointed. If bumped, the egg is more likely to roll in a tight arc than to roll off the cliff. (Royal Alberta Museum)
I wonder if that applies also to pigeons that lay eggs on building ledges, held in place with only a loose stick or two? Seagulls, cormorants, etc.?

RAM goes on to explain the eggs of those marsh birds with the nests right down on the wet ground:
Shorebirds normally lay four pointed eggs. In the nest, the eggs are oriented with their pointed ends towards the centre. This minimizes the amount of space needed to form the nest and increases the efficiency of the heat transfer from parent to egg during incubation.
Of course, a spherical egg is more economical, conserves heat better, is stronger. But they do roll. Great Horned Owls lay spherical eggs; I think I can assume from this that their nest is deep enough to prevent loss.

So much to learn! What fun!

~~~~~~~~~~~
*Cis: not her name, but derived from the blog name.

Monday, February 25, 2008

36 Photos of an egg


Looking for photos of lugworms (for my next post), I re-discovered WaveLength Magazine, a kayaker's mag. The lugworm page was not what I wanted, but "leafing" through back issues, I found this interesting photography assignment:
"Before you leave on your next trip, you should take 36 photos of an egg."
An egg? Why an egg?

The idea, I gather, is to force you to think of new ways to portray your subject. One or two photos won't do the trick; getting 36 different shots of the same simple object just may. Check out their article.

I immediately had to try it out. I took 36 shots of one egg. Half were duds, but looking them over, I thought of new ways I could tackle the assignment, so I'm going to do another 36.

And, before I post any of my results, I want to pass the assignment on:
"Think about an egg. An egg can represent many things. Whiteness, fragility, birth, food, purity, growth—these are some themes of “eggness.” Your assignment: take 36 different pictures of that egg. There are no other rules. Better yet, get a couple of friends to do the same exercise, and share your results."
Anyone want to try this? Let's compare notes: post your results in your own blog, and add a link in the comments here or on my egg post (in a couple of days).

*Update: I have set up a Flickr group where you can add your photos. Here: 36 Photos of an egg. I started it off with a half-dozen: 2 1/2 more to go, for me.
Powered By Blogger